CIP and debt priorities

Fix the worst problems first.

Capital projects should be ranked by need, severity, and how long people have waited. Politics should not decide whose problem matters.

The problem

Some neighborhoods have lived with the same flooding, roads, unsafe crossings, drainage failures, or failing public buildings for decades. Newer or more visible projects often move first because they are easier to sell.

Publish the queue

Every proposed project should show the problem, cost, safety risk, number of people affected, years spent waiting, expected life, operating cost, and what happens if the city delays it. Every neighborhood should be able to see where its project stands and why.

Repair before replacement

Compare repair, retrofit, phased construction, and replacement before approving a new building. A new facility is not automatically the responsible choice.

Use debt honestly

Bonds should pay for necessary assets that will serve residents for many years. Debt should not hide recurring operating costs or crowd out essential school, drainage, road, and public-safety needs.

Growth must pay for capacity

New development should not leave existing taxpayers with the bill for roads, drainage, schools, utilities, emergency response, or other capacity it consumes.

Equity means action

If a community has suffered with a serious problem for 20 years, that delay must count. Severity remains important, but long neglect should move a project forward instead of becoming an excuse to ignore it again.